Review of Article on Arsenic Crisis in Bangladesh - 541 Words

Summary: The people of Bangladesh were dying and getting ill from water. This water was provided through tube wells that were connected to an underground aquifer. Such actions were taken on the 1980’s, when many children died from diarrhea. This project facilitated the lives of many since their people did not have to walk long distances and carry heavy jars full of water. Unfortunately, the water was not checked for arsenic. A dermatologist believed the water from the tube wells contained arsenic but the British Geological Survey insisted it was safe. Today the tubewells are known to have 50 micrograms of arsenic per liter. The article also explains some of the symptoms that could be experienced after 10 years of consuming arsenic contaminated water, these include: black spots, conjunctivitis, bronchitis, diarrhea, etc. The Bangladesh government borrowed money but has not yet taken action since they do not know how to solve this issue. The Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee traine d 160 volunteers to test the tubewells and identify the symptoms of arsenicosis. Many of their volunteers also made maps to inform people of safe tubewells and ponds. 1. What was the purpose or point in writing this article? This article was written to inform people of the hardships poor countries face and to encourage us to be more involved in issues that concern our health. In the article, The British Geological Survey reassure the villagers that their water was safe, however, the waterShow MoreRelatedThe Problem Of Arsenic Laden Water1783 Words   |  8 Pagesdeveloped countries may suffer from lack of quality water. Three articles from two quite different countries, published in the reputed news and scientific journals will be reviewed. The Gravity of the problems, causes and repercussions will be examined. The approaches to counter the water problems will also be evaluated. 1.1. Death in the water Daigle.K (2016), an environmental writer based in Delhi, highlights the problem of Arsenic-laden water in the remote village of Kolsur, near Kolkata in her

Why Music Free Essays

Life has rhythm and melody to it. People may state that they don’t listen to music. Is that true? Sound, it’s all around, whether we like it or not. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Music? or any similar topic only for you Order Now If we live and hear, then avoiding music is impossible. It surrounds us entirely, but why? Why are people drawn to music? Why does music even exist? â€Å"The more mellifluous the singer, the more dexterous the harpist, the more mates he attracts. † According to the article ‘Why Music? ‘ a reason for why people choose to listen and perform music is because of sex and love. There is some truth in that hypothesis: the better the musician is, the more attractive they will be to potential mates. Many famous singers and band members that are widely known around the world can thank both their talent and physical appearance for their success. Fans might enjoy their music purely because they are attracted to that certain artist instead of to the music itself. This argument states that music exists just to allow people to attract and fall in love, but that may not be entirely true. The author states, † A man does not have to be gay to enjoy the music of an all-male orchestra. † This makes sense, and just proves that the argument of sex being the reason for music wrong. % of the world’s population has amusia, where they can’t understand and distinguish differences in music; so would that mean they aren’t capable to fall in love? There are also many songs that are being recorded, performed and enjoyed where their lyrics have nothing to do with love, sex or relationships, for example traditional, children and purely instrumental songs. They are considered music, but aren’t connected to mating. So therefore, this argument, no matter how reasonable can’t be entirely true. There has to be a reason that is fully accurate though. So, if it’s not sex, what else could it be? Social bonding? Music may exist for us because it helps bind us together just like it did for our past ancestors; the early humans. Before music’s emergence, an important social activity was grooming. Grooming was a vital way to allow primates and animals not only to clean their pelts but also to socialize. As groups expanded over time, social grooming became harder and â€Å"the gap was bridged by music, which may thus be seen as a precursor to language,† as Dr. Dunbar believes. Nowadays we still listen to music in groups, and it still is a way to socialize. Concerts, clubs, parties, all are places and events where people who enjoy and share the same interests in music gather together. People may not only get together because of similar taste in music, but they might also have other interests that are the same. But, like the first hypothesis, it can’t be entirely true. Isn’t it possible for people to listen to music when they are by themselves? Of course, it might not be as enjoyable and the whole atmosphere of it may not be as vivid, but it still is possible. People are constantly listening to their personal music players. By themselves. There are also times when people want to listen to music on their own, to allow them to forget everything else†¦ have some time just to listen and think without other people around them. Adding to this, just pretend that every single person, from all the countries, on this Earth decided to get together in groups according to interests in music. Two problems: the groups would be way too large and too hectic; also, people might find different types of music appealing to them, so for that reason choosing only one group to belong and stay in would be too hard, confusing and just a waste of time. This theory is hard to agree with, and may be even less believable than the first one. An accident? Or an invention? Maybe both, maybe none. Most of us are born with the special ability to hear and either to enjoy or hate the sounds that we notice in this world, and there skills have allowed us to start inventing the music we know today. At least, according to Dr. Pinker; he further believes that music is an â€Å"auditory cheesecake† he also suggested that if either music or cheesecake â€Å"vanished from the species little else would change. † No. This argument has very little value to it, and isn’t very convincing. First of all, we aren’t the inventors of music, humankind merely classified certain noise that according to the sound like what music should be. Secondly, music doesn’t have to be the work of famous classical composers; the catchy pop songs heard on the radio; the unique flavor of each country’s traditional music, it can be anything. It is arguable that music can be the sound of a dog panting after a long run; water pouring down great and majestic waterfalls; the loud traffic at busy intersections during rush hour; or pretty much anything we hear. For instance, the composer John Cage was one of the first people to breakdown the barriers and rules that music from the past had. He is most famous for his piece 4’33† where for four minutes and thirty-three seconds, not one single note is played by the performer on stage, in its place, the whole piece is coming from the noises that the audience and the atmosphere of the place makes, therefore that being the music. Likewise, it is possible to disagree with the statement that little would change if music was to disappear. Many, many people wouldn’t have jobs such as the numerous musicians everywhere. Visualize a world without any music. None. Movies need music to create a mood, just picture a whole film without music. What about radios? What could we all dance to? Sing our hearts out to? Nothing†¦ without music. Countless things around us are based on music, and our lives wouldn’t be complete without it. The more this hypothesis is thought about, the more mistakes it contains, and the less believable it becomes. In conclusion, although there are some that seem more accurate than other, none of the three hypotheses are one hundred percent correct for why music exists and why we listen to it. However, there has to be a reason why. Maybe a combination of the first and second hypothesis, with none or very little contribution from the third hypothesis. It is possible that reasons why are because music changes moods, creates atmospheres, and is an escape for all of us. People all listen to music, and too many people take it for granted, without paying attention to it, really thinking and wondering why we all listen to music. How to cite Why Music?, Papers

Strategic Business Management Productivity of Team

Question: Discuss about the Strategic Business Management for Productivity of Team. Answer: Introduction: Time management in work place is important for every team member and manager to complete a task within stipulated time. Time management in work place increases productivity of team member and reduces wastage of resources. Time management reduces stress and increases job satisfaction of the employees. The important factors for time management is to knowing specific roles and responsibilities in work place, organisations goals, well organised work structure etc. Effective time management can be done by preparing an action plan. The action plan shows time limit for every task, which motivates the team member to finish the tasks within time (Einarsen et al., 2016). Workflow management improves team performances. Different business process management software can be used for work flow management. The softwares help to manage collaboration between co-workers and different department, communication among the different team members and management. The workflow management system in workplace presents a report about key performance indicators for each team member. These KPIs help the manager to manage performance of the team members effectively. Commitment of the team member towards job responsibilities improves performance of the organisation and increases growth prospect. Commitment of the team member is useful to build an organised ad cohesive team. A cohesive team can take any challenge and risk in any project whether it is small or large projects. The team members, who are committed to the organisation, are able to produce optimum outcome by utilising allocated resources efficiently (Shaw et al., 2014). However, for optimum outcome, every team member needs to be given roles according to their skills. References Einarsen, S., Skogstad, A., Rrvik, E., Lande, . B., Nielsen, M. B. (2016). Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: a moderated mediation analysis.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22. Shaw, W. S., Besen, E., Pransky, G., Boot, C. R., Nicholas, M. K., McLellan, R. K., Tveito, T. H. (2014). Manage at work: a randomized, controlled trial of a self-management group intervention to overcome workplace challenges associated with chronic physical health conditions.BMC public health,14(1), 1.